Please Follow us on  Gab,  Minds, Telegram,  Rumble, Truth Social, Gettr, Twitter

New York City Mayor Eric Adams has found himself at the center of a political firestorm after being indicted on federal charges related to money and benefits he received from foreign entities that he failed to report.  The indictment alleges that Adams received over $100,000 in payments and benefits from foreign sources over nearly a decade.  This news has drawn comparisons to the legal challenges faced by former President Donald Trump and New Jersey Senator Bob Menendez, both of whom have been targeted by what many believe to be politically motivated prosecutions. 

Critics argue that the indictment against Mayor Adams is part of a larger pattern of "lawfare" - the use of legal proceedings as a weapon to target political opponents.  They point out that the amount of money involved in the case against Adams is relatively small and that the payments were spread out over a significant period.  Some have even suggested that the indictment is retaliation for Adams' recent criticism of the Biden/Harris administration's immigration policies.  In a city with a no-bail law and violent criminals being released after barely being booked, it seems quite ironic that its Mayor is now under Federal indictment. 

‘NO AD’ subscription for CDM!  Sign up here and support real investigative journalism and help save the republic!‘  

In recent months, Mayor Adams has spoken out against the influx of undocumented immigrants into the United States, arguing that the Biden/Harris administration's policies have led to a crisis at the southern border.  He has also expressed concern about the impact of illegal immigration on crime rates in New York City, arguing that the city's resources are being strained by the influx of new arrivals and asking for billions in federal handouts to cope with the problem. 

Some argue that the indictment is an attempt by the 'Uniparty' - a term used to describe the establishment political class in Washington, which is perceived to be a single entity due to their shared interests and actions—to silence dissent and maintain its grip on power.  They point out that both Trump and Menendez have been targeted by similar legal proceedings and argue that the use of lawfare threatens democratic norms and the rule of law. 

The indictment against Mayor Adams comes during heightened political polarization in the United States.  Many Americans are frustrated with the perceived failures of the Biden/Harris administration, particularly on issues like immigration and crime.  Legal proceedings targeting political opponents will likely inflame tensions further and deepen divisions in an already polarized political landscape. 

As the case against Mayor Adams moves forward, monitoring the proceedings and ensuring that Justice is served closely will be necessary.  At the same time, it is crucial that we remain vigilant against the use of lawfare as a political weapon and work to protect the integrity of our legal system and the rule of law.  Should Vice President Harris be elected, Adams would likely spend a significant amount of time behind bars, regardless of the truth and facts. 

The lawfare phenomenon is not new but has gained increasing attention in recent years as political tensions have escalated.  Governments and political groups worldwide use legal proceedings to target political opponents.  Take President Bolsinaro of Brazil, for example; it poses a significant threat to democratic norms and the rule of law.  Again, it is pretty ironic as Democrats who claim to be saving 'democracy' are blatantly using the Department of Justice to create a two-tiered standard of Justice—one for the powerful and the other for the rest of us poor saps, where the powerful are given preferential treatment.  President Trump is correct when he rightly points this out. 

Lawfare has been particularly evident in the United States in recent years, with high-profile cases like those against Trump and Menendez drawing widespread attention.  These cases have raised concerns about the politicization of the justice system and the potential for legal proceedings to be used as a tool of political repression. 

As the case against Mayor Adams unfolds, Americans must remain vigilant and engaged in the political process.  We must work to ensure that our legal system remains independent and impartial and that Justice is served without regard to political affiliation or ideology.  Citizens have standing to sue the government for civil rights violations and abrogations of the Constitution.  Therefore, we hope that the legal system will be turned against the Uniparty Swamp, particularly in red states. 

At the same time, we must also be willing to speak out against the use of lawfare and other forms of political repression.  The health of our democracy depends on our ability to engage in open and honest debate and hold our leaders accountable for their actions.  Whether President Trump is reelected or not, we must continue using all of our Constitutional rights, including the First Amendment, to save America. 

In the end, the indictment against Mayor Adams may prove to be a pivotal moment in the ongoing struggle against lawfare and political repression.  By shining a light on this issue and demanding accountability from our leaders, we can help to ensure that our democracy remains strong and vibrant for generations to come.