Clicky

BREAKING: Forensic Experts Suggest Mathematical “Red Flags” In First Round of Brazilian Presidential Election, Cites Benford’s Law

October 31, 2022
12 Comments
Views 17004

Please Follow us on GabMinds, TelegramRumble, Gab TV, Truth Social, Gettr, Twitter

Guest post by Matthew Tyrmand

This dossier was provided to us by a credible expert source and was created by a small group of technical experts in the fields of mathematics, political science, and forensic analysis, all who are well versed in election statistics and electoral anomalies.

The source provided this document and demonstrated the credibility of the authors who are presenting here their statistical findings on the first round of the Brazilian elections (held Sunday October 2nd).

The source group applied Benford’s Law, a highly recognized statistical formula, to analyze publicly available data provided by the Brazilian Electoral Court (TSE). The formula showed inconsistencies in voting tabulation in several regions across the country.

The links to the TSE’s publicly available data is in the document, and other experts are invited to conduct the same Benford’s Law test on the data. The voting tabulation graphs are also available — showing the region, the candidate, and the digit analyzed. Several charts show Benford’s Law curve in a certain format, while the actual curve of the vote tabulation veers completely off from it. This is what points to manipulation according to the expert source.

‘NO AD’ subscription for CDM!  Sign up here and support real investigative journalism and help save the republic!‘

Benford’s Law never definitively proves fraud in and of itself. It is a methodology that is used to detect anomalies in large datasets, and thus help an auditor focus his audit on the clusters of data that present the anomalies. It serves as a “red flag” that, according to our source, should catalyze an audit review of the data in a system where auditors operate in good faith.

According to the source: the data patterns outlined in the dossier contain many strong anomalies that are glaring red flags. This is especially the case in the northeastern region of the country.

The curves and graphs in these compiled chart patterns present similarities to questionable elections in Iran and Venezuela in the past. This also greatly alarmed the expert source team.

We recommend that people read the document themselves and draw their own conclusions.

It is important to highlight that people in Brazil are unable to report news on such matters due to fears of Court persecution. As both Fox News and the New York Times have recently reported, there is clear indication that the Supreme and Electoral Courts are biased and will clamp down on anyone who investigates election integrity in Brazil or journalists reporting information that might be construed as calling into question the integrity of the election systems or the court’s own enforcement actions.

According to our source, the Brazilian central electoral body insists on obfuscating the transparency of the electoral process, which should be crystal clear and open to all forms of visibility and provides for an open and public count that allows for a subsequent physical audit. That any experts from the sciences have to publish this document without attribution for fear of running afoul of the Brazilian federal courts politically motivated meting out of “justice” and their Praetorian guard police force’s unconstitutional enforcement activity at the court’s behest, is a great tragedy for contemporary Brazil.

Needless to say, the threat to democracy in the stifling of open debate, especially on controversial issues, such as electoral mechanisms and systems, is manifestly clear.

N.b. This report has been released for distribution after the second round polls closed so as not to interfere with the electoral decision making of any Brazilian citizen voters.

DOWNLOAD THE PDF FILE BELOW

ImageDownload

Matthew Tyrmand is an investigative and editorial political journalist who splits time between the USA and Europe (given his Polish American roots). He has worked on corruption investigations, electoral analysis, forensic auditing the public sector and serves on the boards and in the management of several of the top American journalist and activist organizations. He is often seen across American and European media and is a frequent guest on Bannon’s WarRoom and Polish television (TVP World).

SHARE

12 comments on “BREAKING: Forensic Experts Suggest Mathematical “Red Flags” In First Round of Brazilian Presidential Election, Cites Benford’s Law”

  1. Sounds like a repeat of the US election theft. The drill is the same, including judicial and media capture.

    Maybe the Marxists should publish the script like a Betty Crocker recipe for baking an election. Sure to be a bestseller on the New York Times book list.

  2. Mandem mais informações por favor, pois a suprema corte (STF) e o tribunal superior eleitoral (TSE) estão bloqueando as mídias e mandando prender as pessoas que falam algo a respeito. Eles usam o “entendimento” da Lei da forma deles e estão com isso usando seus poderes e influência no judiciário de forma autoritária. Eles abrem o inquérito, eles mesmo juntam as provas, eles mesmos julgam e condenam.
    Ajudem-nos, pelo amor de Deus.

  3. As eleições foram fraldadas, mas somos perseguidos pelo Ministro Alexandre de Moraes, que parece o Deus desse país. Estamos nas ruas, não aceitamos ser governados por ex presidiário corrupto.
    Precisamos de intervenção militar já.

  4. As eleições foram fraldadas, mas somos perseguidos pelo Ministro Alexandre de Moraes, que parece o Deus desse país. Estamos nas ruas, não aceitamos ser governados por ex presidiário corrupto.
    Precisamos de intervenção militar já.

  5. A nação brasileira foi feita de tola!!!
    Fomos ás urnas votar mas os inescrupulosos já tinham o resultado em mãos.
    Isso não é democracia!!!

  6. A nação brasileira foi feita de tola!!!
    Fomos ás urnas votar mas os inescrupulosos já tinham o resultado em mãos.
    Isso não é democracia!!!

    *Meu comentário anterior saiu com erro na digitação não entendí o porque.
    Agora estou colando aqui e copiando e acrescentando essa observação.
    Por favor não publique se não for como escreví.

  7. O que está havendo no meu comentário?
    Digito de forma adequada e ao publicar está com erros
    Não me agrada isso!

  8. 🙏🇧🇷👩‍👩‍👦‍👦🤝👏Transparência nas urnas!!!
    Fizeram a nação de tolos nos levando ás urnas mas já com os resultados em mãos inescrupulosas.
    Isso não é democracia!!!

    Se meu comentário não estiver da forma como estou digitando (sem erros) por favor não publique!!!
    Pois confiro antes de enviar e ao publicar a prévia estou visualizando de forma diferente da que digitei!

  9. tendentious material that does not point to any fraud, but tends to induce those unaware that there would be an alleged fraud.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Copyright © 2022 The Miami Independent