Please Follow us on  Gab, Minds, Telegram, Rumble, Truth Social, Gettr, Twitter, Youtube 

Doral, Florida - The State of Florida, long a model of economic growth and conservative fiscal policy, now faces a paradox: while bathed in sunshine and surrounded by natural beauty, it is flirting with energy insolvency. Despite its bounty of natural gas and a history of reliable and affordable electric power, the Sunshine State is increasingly embracing wind and solar energy—two intermittent sources heavily reliant on subsidies, regulatory distortion and taxpayer support.

‘NO AD’ subscription for CDM!  Sign up here and support real investigative journalism and help save the republic!  

According to energy analyst Dave Walsh, a speaker at last weekend’s Reclaim Campaign event in Venice, Florida, this green energy shift is not only misguided—it is a direct threat to Florida’s economic sustainability.

Dave Walsh, former president of Mitsubishi-Hitachi Power Americas and a frequent commentator on energy policy, has issued repeated warnings about the consequences of an overreliance on renewable energy. His central thesis is simple: wind and solar power are not financially or technically viable replacements for baseload energy.

Unlike clean coal, natural gas or nuclear—which produce consistent power regardless of time or weather—wind and solar depend on conditions beyond human control. In Florida, that volatility translates into higher costs, increasing grid instability, and growing dependence on backup generation that negates many of the claimed environmental benefits.

Misguided Incentives

Florida’s flirtation with bankruptcy-by-renewables begins with misguided incentives. State and federal subsidies have fueled the construction of massive solar farms and planning for offshore wind turbines. While these projects are often promoted as "free energy from nature," they come at a very real cost to taxpayers and utility ratepayers. Solar panel installations require vast tracts of land, expensive lithium-ion battery backups, and regular maintenance, all of which are typically financed through public-private partnerships that shift financial risk onto the state’s utility ratepayers.

At the core of the issue is the fundamental mismatch between renewable energy supply and consumer demand. Florida's energy usage peaks during hot, humid summer afternoons, when air conditioning is essential for survival.

1. Solar power can help during the day, but its output vanishes at dusk—just as demand remains high.
2. Wind power is even less reliable, as Florida's wind speeds are among the lowest in the nation and rarely coincide with peak demand periods.

To fill the gap, utilities must maintain parallel fossil fuel infrastructure—effectively paying for two systems at once. The result? Rising electric power rates, wasted investment and fiscal stress.

These costs ripple through the economy. Homeowners and renters see higher monthly electric power rates. Small businesses struggle with energy unpredictability. Industrial users face supply limitations that discourage investment and expansion. Meanwhile, the state government is forced to divert public funds toward green energy infrastructure that fails to deliver dependable supply of electric power. According to Walsh, this is a recipe for economic erosion: “We are funding fantasy energy at the expense of real prosperity.”

Environmental Costs of Green Energy

Beyond the economic ledger, the environmental case for wind and solar in Florida is also more complicated than advertised.

1. Solar panel production and disposal present significant ecological concerns. The panels contain toxic materials such as cadmium and lead, which can leach into groundwater if not properly recycled—a process that is costly and underdeveloped.
2. Wind turbines, for their part, have limited lifespans, and their massive fiberglass blades are largely non-recyclable, often ending up in landfills.

Additionally, there is the issue of land use. Large-scale solar farms require thousands of acres that displace natural ecosystems, farmland or rural communities. The push for offshore wind turbines—though still in early stages in Florida—threatens marine life and local fisheries. Walsh argues that these environmental trade-offs are rarely acknowledged in the glossy marketing campaigns that promote green energy.

Grid Reliability

A particularly insidious consequence of this shift to green energy is the erosion of grid reliability. In a state prone to hurricanes and tropical storms, energy security is not a luxury—it is a necessity. Traditional energy plants are built to withstand storms and restore power quickly. By contrast, solar farms and wind turbines are fragile and must often be shut down in advance of severe weather. After Hurricane Ian in 2022, thousands of Floridians waited days for electric power, and renewable systems were among the slowest to recover. This raises a critical question: can Florida afford to gamble on weather-dependent sources of electric power in a climate that demands resilience?

The answer, according to Walsh, is “No”—and the costs are mounting. He cites California and Germany as cautionary tales. Both jurisdictions pursued aggressive renewable agendas, only to experience spiking prices, grid blackouts and declining industrial competitiveness. We also saw the electric power blackouts in Spain and Portugal earlier this year due to their reliance exclusively on wind and solar power. Florida, he warns, is heading down the same road unless it reverses course quickly.

Energy Realism

What, then, is the alternative? Walsh advocates for a return to energy realism. That means investing in reliable baseload generation—particularly natural gas, in which Florida is rich—and expanding nuclear energy, which produces zero emissions without the volatility of solar and wind. It also means ending the distorting subsidies and mandates that force utilities to prioritize the environmental ideology over energy output. It also means not turning off existing plants that are producing efficient energy, even when they are burning clean coal.

Dave Walsh insists that energy policy must be grounded in physics, engineering and economics—not environmental ideology. Florida’s strength has always been its pragmatism, its low taxes, and its business-friendly environment. But green energy mandates threaten to undermine all three pillars by raising costs, introducing uncertainty, and centralizing control in regulatory bureaucracies and ESG-driven corporate boards of electric utilities.

In conclusion, Florida’s energy future hangs in the balance. While the sun may shine brightly, the state cannot afford to bet its economic health on the mirage of “free” renewable energy. As Dave Walsh repeatedly argues, energy is the master resource—without reliable and affordable power, everything else collapses.

It is time for Florida’s leaders to reassess their course, reject the seductive promises of intermittent renewables, and embrace a policy rooted in reliability, affordability, and accountability. Otherwise, the state risks turning its bright future into a dim financial and infrastructural crisis.