The Miami Independent Logo
Est. 2022 ·
A CDM Site
The Miami Independent Logo
Est. 2022 ·
A CDM Site
  • Upcoming Judicial Elections In Miami-Dade County

    March 3, 2026
    0
    Public Domain

    Please Follow us on  Gab, Minds, Telegram, Rumble, Truth Social, Gettr, Twitter, Youtube 

    Edited by Eduardo Vidal

    Miami, Florida — This year may bring Miami-Dade County’s quietest judicial elections—and the loudest complaints from its citizens. Nearly 40 judicial seats are on the 2026 ballot in Miami-Dade County for the election on Tuesday, August 18.

    Every single one of them, so far, is unopposed. Not lightly contested. Not weakly challenged. Unopposed. Candidates will have one week in April to qualify for these elections.

    County Court:

    Ritamaria Cuervo

    Kevin Hellmann

    Joanne Hernandez

    Donald “DJ” Cannava Jr.

    Raul A. Cuervo

    Stephanie R. Silver

    Luis Perez-Medina

    Betty Capote-Erben

    Natalie Moore

    Victoria Ferrer

    Gordon Charles Murray Sr.

    Circuit Court:

    Ivonne Cuesta

    Angélica D. Zayas

    Jose M. Rodriguez

    Daryl E. Trawick

    Migna Sanchez-Llorens

    Tanya Brinkley

    Peter R. Lopez

    Alberto Milian

    Christine Hernandez

    Spencer Multack

    Michelle Alvarez Barakat

    Orlando A. Prescott

    Michelle Delancy

    Stacy D. Glick

    Cristina Miranda

    Abby Cynamon

    Marcia B. Caballero

    Joseph D. Perkins

    Laura Gonzalez-Marques

    Denise Martinez-Scanziani

    Mavel Ruiz

    Richard Hersch

    Veronica A. Diaz

    Reemberto Diaz

    Carlos M. Guzman

    Carlos H. Gamez

    Spencer Eig

    Beatrice A. Butchko

    Andrea Ricker Wolfson

    Forty seats. Zero competition.

    Judicial qualifying runs for four days in April, from noon on April 20 through noon on April 24. If no one files during that window, these races are effectively decided.

    Yet Miami-Dade County residents continue to voice frustration. Homeowners rage about insurance premiums. Parents rage about family court delays. Defendants rage about plea deals that feel automatic. Everyone blames Tallahassee. Everyone blames “the system.”

    But the system has names. They’re listed above.

    These judges control docket speed. They rule on summary judgments that can end an insurance case before a jury ever hears it. They decide custody schedules that shape children’s lives for years. They preside over plea negotiations that resolve the overwhelming majority of criminal cases. Not one of them currently has to defend a record against an opponent. Not one.

    Let’s be clear about something else: Judges are not neutral furniture in a courtroom. They sanction wayward lawyers. They manage discovery disputes. They grant or deny continuances. They enforce deadlines. They determine whether litigation becomes efficient resolution or procedural trench warfare.

    In insurance disputes, they watch carriers and policyholder attorneys battle over leverage while homeowners wait. In family court, they see conflict escalate as fees climb and savings drain. In criminal court, they oversee a system that prioritizes throughput because it must.

    Insurance companies do not vote. Homeowners do. Litigants do. Taxpayers fund the system. When cases drag and costs spiral, the public absorbs it.

    Judges have the authority to rein in abuse and demand professionalism. That authority matters. When it never faces competition, it grows comfortable. Power that never faces challenge becomes entrenched. Entrenched power rarely reforms itself.

    Here’s the uncomfortable truth: The loudest critics of the courts are often lawyers. Lawyers who practice in these courtrooms. Lawyers who know the judges. Lawyers who understand the docket realities. Lawyers who privately complain about inefficiencies.

    And when qualifying opens? Silence.

    Running is expensive. It is awkward. Challenging a sitting judge in the courthouse where you earn your living requires nerve. So instead, the profession critiques the system over drinks and protects it at the ballot.

    If Miami-Dade County’s courts are functioning perfectly, then this is stability. If they are not, then this is complacency.

    Most Miami-Dade County voters already know: insurance is too expensive, courts move too slowly, and family litigation drains savings. Yet the people shaping those outcomes are running alone.

    And appellate justices? Voters do not choose between candidates. They simply vote yes or no on retention. That is not competitive accountability. It is default retention.

    Ballots will be printed. Names will be listed. No opponents will appear. No alternatives.

    If no one files by April 24, nearly 40 judicial seats in Miami-Dade County will move forward uncontested. After that, outrage is just noise.

    Democracy allows challenge. It does not supply courage.

    ‘NO AD’ subscription for CDM!  Sign up here and support real investigative journalism and help save the republic!  

    Author

    Avatar photo

    Fulvia Cruz

    Fulvia Cruz, a concerned citizen watching the Game of Thrones in Miami-Dade County.
    guest

    0 Comments
    Oldest
    Newest Most Voted
  • magnifiercrossmenu