• Mailin’ It In - - Vote-By-Mail Is Rife With Fraud!

    January 24, 2023
    1 Comment

    Please Follow us on GabMindsTelegramRumbleGab TVTruth SocialGettrTwitter

    [Miami,  Florida] After the hanging chads debacle in Florida during the Presidential election of 2000,  former President Jimmy Carter,  a Democrat from Atlanta,  and former Secretary of State James Baker,  a Republican from Houston,  reached across the aisle and led a bi-partisan commission to investigate election procedures.  One of their main conclusions was that Vote-By-Mail is rife with fraud.

    Vote-By-Mail has a long history in the United States,  going back at least to the Presidential election of 1864,  when some 80% of the mail-in ballots cast by the soldiers in the Union Army were for the re-election of their commander-in-chief President Lincoln.  Since then absentee ballots for citizens serving in the military,  or having another documented inability to appear in person at the polling station,  have been common in all States.  Since that Presidential election of 2000,  however,  Vote-By-Mail automatically and unconditionally has been adopted by many States.  The Wuhan flu virus epidemic of 2020 caused as many as 37 States to loosen their election integrity precautions and further expand Vote-By-Mail.  The desire to facilitate voter turnout has caused States to increase the risk of election fraud through Vote-By-Mail.

    Tired of pop-up ads on your phone reading CDM?  We have to make money but try our 'no ad' subscription and get your news without ads!

    The Public Interest Legal Foundation,  based in Indianapolis and focused on election integrity,  reported this month that a significant percentage of mail-in ballots were rejected by election officials last year in California.  The main reasons for rejection were that:  (1)  they were not received in time,  mostly due to delays by the United States Postal Service  (48%);  and  (2)  signature mismatch or lack thereof  (50%).  In addition,  more than 10 million mail-in ballots were unaccounted for.  California automatically mails ballots to all active registered voters,  making chain-of-custody impossible to maintain.  Foundation President Christian Adams observes:  “Mail-in ballots disenfranchise….California’s Vote-By-Mail demonstration should serve as a warning to state legislators elsewhere.”

    Vote-By-Mail fails most of the safeguards against election fraud:  (1)  There should be a valid reason for not being able to vote in person at the polling station.  (2)  Photo ID verification is not possible  (despite the requirement to show photo ID for almost everything else).  (3)  Secrecy and confidentiality are compromised,  allowing undue influence and coercion to be applied to voters,  and facilitating vote buying.  (4)  Signature verification is made more complicated.  (5)  Chain-of-custody is difficult to maintain with Vote-By-Mail.  (6)  Vote-By-Mail facilitates ballot harvesting by third parties,   who collect mail-in ballots from unrelated voters.  

    Vote-By-Mail turns the United States Postal Service into the largest precinct in the country,  with no oversight by poll-watchers.  In addition:  (1)  Requests for Vote-By-Mail should be required before each election cycle,  and should not be maintained in perpetuity.  (2)  Mail-in ballots should contain a security question that must be answered correctly.  (3)  Mail-in ballots should be required to be received by the election officials not later than election day.

    Vote-By-Mail is banned in most countries,  because they have seen the massive problems with election fraud,  but is allowed by some countries for citizens living abroad.  Mexico previously did not allow it,  but since 2006 has allowed citizens living abroad to request a mail-in ballot at least six months in advance of election day.  Brazil,  however,  bans mail-in ballots and requires citizens abroad to vote in person at consulates,  bringing photo ID.

    Vote-By-Mail was banned in France during 1975 after massive fraud in Corsica,  including stolen or bought mail-in ballots and voting by dead citizens.  The newspaper Le Monde reported:  “To reduce electoral fraud,  mail-in voting is abandoned.”  The delegate in the National Assembly who introduced the bill observed:  “There is within the electoral process certain preferred areas where fraud is more prevalent,  because the offered facility creates an easy temptation,  an extra propensity,  sometimes almost an indecent provocation.  Such,  ladies and gentlemen,  is mail-in voting….Observers generally agree on this point - - mail-in voting is one of the preferred methods of fraud.”  The French Interior Minister observed:  “Our electoral legislation has evolved along two axes,  which we are today starting to realize do not necessarily coincide:  (1)  The first axis is the concern to make suffrage ever more open and easier.  (2)  The second axis has been the quest for an ever more sincere vote.”  In 2020 France 24 news channel reported:  “Postal voting has been abolished in France since 1975 because it lent itself to manipulation.”

    Advocates of Vote-By-Mail point to its convenience,  which is considered a big plus in today’s culture of online shopping and courier delivery.  After all,  if you can stay at home,  order all your groceries online,  and have them delivered to your front door,  then why should you not do the same thing when it comes to voting?  Because voting is not entirely the same as shopping.  

    Vote-By-Mail greatly increases the risk of fraud,  which undermines the legitimacy of our democratic elections.  Convenience is a plank on the road to serfdom.  Free and self-governing citizens of a constitutional republic are proud to show up and vote in person,  instead of mailing it in.

    Vote-By-Mail Delenda Est!

    Eduardo Vidal is a lawyer and political activist. His family brought him when he was nine years old from Cuba to the USA, but now the rule of law has been eroded in the USA as well, and we are turning into Cuba and the rest of Latin America.



    Eduardo Vidal

    Eduardo Vidal is a lawyer and political activist. His family brought him when he was nine years old from Cuba to the USA, but now the rule of law has been eroded in the USA as well, and we are turning into Cuba and the rest of Latin America.

    Continue Reading


    1 Comment
    Newest Most Voted
    Inline Feedbacks
    View all comments
    Claudio Cioffi, PhD
    Claudio Cioffi, PhD
    1 year ago

    All quite true, as far as it goes. However, a more complete understanding of the current situation suggests a different strategy: do vote by mail *and* verify that your is counted. There is no question that voting by mail is a very bad idea, for reasons given here and elsewhere. BUT, right now, when voting by mail IS legal and used (and abused) by opponents of conservatives, it makes no sense to abstain from voting by mail because progressive voters DO use mail voting to the hilt (so they cast more votes) plus there is more opportunity to actually vote rather than waiting for the official voting day (when many circumstance always arise against actually voting). IF mail voting were not available, at all, to nobody, then that would be the best. But as long as it IS available (and leftists use it), conservatives would be fools not to avail themselves of the mailing opportunity. Conservative voters should study and understand the COMPLETE variety of ways in which leftist voters and use the same or even more clever strategies to win elections. Voters who decide to only vote in person on Election Day will never win an election; not under the extant rules. We have an Election Season, not just one day. Let's use it, to the hilt! Maybe we'll win more elections. That would be nice.

    Follow Us

  • Miami has long suffered from a lack of opposing opinions to the corporate media narrative. We aim to create Miami's and Florida's premier investigative newspaper and will bring the truth, no matter where that truth lands
    Copyright © 2024 The Miami Independent